Voting for and supporting the United Kingdom Independence Party is the only method of registering your outright opposition to the UK's incorporation into the emerging EU super-state. Only the UK Independence Party is committed to withdrawing from the EU - the only way to halt this process. More than 70% of UK laws are now drafted in Brussels by bureaucrats you have never heard of, didn’t elect and can never sack. Westminster can neither change these laws nor repeal them - no matter how unsuitable they turn out to be for Britain’s needs and situation. In effect, your MP has become a very expensive rubber stamp. Voting for any party, that will remain a member of an EU that looks anything like the current EU, is a wasted vote. Anything they promise you is ultimately subject to a veto by the EU!
What about the argument that a vote for UKIP might let 'X' or 'Y' in? Well, analysis of the 2004 European Parliamentary election results indicates that UKIP takes its support roughly equally from the traditional three parties (and, incidentally, nearly half comes from people who don't usually vote). So we are a threat (or not) to them all equally.
The Liberal Democrats. The Lib. Dem. position is clear and honest. A vote for them is a vote for accelerated integration of the UK within the EU. They didn't even want a referendum on the EU Constitution they just wanted to sign up to it.
The Labour Party. New Labour likes to play the patriot when it suits it but the recent statements of the party leadership leave little doubt. They wish to adopt the Euro, sign up to the EU Constitution and to be at the heart of the evolving European state.
The Conservatives. A vote for the Conservatives is also a vote for continued integration with the EU. Michael Howard has said that the Conservative party is committed to the UK's membership of the EU and he can see no circumstances when it would pull us out of the EU,. We can only take him at his word. For years the Conservatives have been paralysed by the 'In Europe but not run by Europe' doctrine. This not only falls into the Euro-Nationalist's trap of muddling the EU and 'Europe' (the EU is not 'Europe' yet – and, by the way, we are anti-EU not anti-European!) but it is also obviously rubbish. As far back as 1988, the Merchant Shipping act was passed by both Houses of Parliament but was then overturned by the European Court as being against EU law and all Parliament could do was meekly agree and amend the law! We are already 'In the EU and run by the EU'. The Conservative Party is currently advocating renegotiating some of the areas of EU control over the UK but it has no real hope of succeeding in this (as one of its own Peers said, the Conservative negotiating strategy is similar to a robber going into a bank with a gun and saying 'hand over the money - by the way this isn't loaded'!). However, if the Conservative Party was elected into government and managed to do all that it is promising to do, where would we be? We would not have the Euro or the Constitution and we would have back some control over our fisheries and farming but we would still be in the position of trying to maintain our place on the steep slope towards 'every closer union'. EU courts would still have power over UK courts. The majority of our legislation would still be originating from Brussels, backed up by a European Court that enforced its application and steadily increased the remit of the EU. We would still have the same sham EU parliament and the all-powerful unelected Commissioners. We would still be enmeshed in a centralised, undemocratic embryonic super-state of a type that was contrary to every tradition we have and one desperately trying to go in a direction we don't want to go in.